THE “GOD COMPLEX” EXPLAINS WHY THE ROTHSCHILDS CRIME SYNDICATE THAT OWNS 60+% OF ALL WEALTH & RESOURCES ALWAYS WANTS MORE – GREED + CONTROL + DOMINATION!

THE “GOD COMPLEX” EXPLAINS WHY THE ROTHSCHILDS CRIME SYNDICATE THAT OWNS 60+% OF ALL WEALTH & RESOURCES ALWAYS WANTS MORE – GREED + CONTROL + DOMINATION!

See at bottom a description of Terry Steuck’s book which is not the purpose of this Analysis but illustrates the GOD Complex potential.

ERNEST JONES DEFINED THE GOD (OR GdD) COMPLEX – HIS DEFINITION FITS MANY KINGS, QUEENS, OR ROTHSCHILDS COMPLEXES THAT HAVE CAUSED INCREDIBLE  HUMAN SUFFERING!  

GdD COMPLEX ORIGIN:  1923 AD: The first person to document the term GOD-COMPLEX was Ernest Jones (1879–1958) in his Essays in Applied Psycho-Analysis.  His research can be found in The International Psycho-Analytical Library #5: Essays in Applied Psycho-Analysis, by Ernest Jones, M.D., President of the International Psycho-Analytical Association and of the British Psycho-Analytical Society. Ernest Jones (1879-1958), a neurologist and psychoanalyst who was a lifelong friend and colleague of Sigmund Freud from their first meeting in 1908, and became his official biographer. Jones was the first English-speaking practitioner of psychoanalysis and became its leading exponent in the English-speaking world.

Click for Source Article by Ernest Jones

ROTHSCHILDS GOD COMPLEX: Unshakable belief in Self-GODLINESS – Belief in their GODLY Personal abilities, privileges, & absolute refusal to admit any mistakes.

DEFINE: God Complex is an unshakable belief characterized by consistently inflated feelings of personal ability, privilege, or infallibility. A refusal to admit the possibility of their error or failure, even in the face of irrefutable evidence, intractable problems or difficult or impossible tasks. GOD Complex persons are highly dogmatic in their views and views their personal opinions are laws that are unquestionably correct. They have ZERO regard for others and the conventions and demands of society, and demand special privileges.

The GdD COMPLEX: THE BELIEF THAT ONE IS GOD WITH THE RESULTING CHARACTER TRAITS

GdD Complex is a very dangerous and curious sickness with megalomaniac fantasies barely comprehensible to most of humanity. Most of humanity cannot imagine wanting all the wealth in the world of the desire to rule the world as a dictator. Perhaps that is why most people discount this as NOT being possible.

GdD Complex is a purely psychological view that magnifies & idealizes ones Devine powers and abilities. Perhaps it is self-love to an extreme degree that like the past Kings & Queens who have declared themselves as GOD with Devine Rights, Powers, and a Divine Spirit. They see themselves as beyond King or Queen. Of course, this does not involve actual facts, reason or logic.

GdD Complex — The Roman Empire was perpetually exposed to this menace. Likewise in religion we see indications of the same process with Buddha, Mahomet, Peter, and Moses. Believing they have powers of GOD or that GOD has given them. Clearly, there are many degrees of the GdD Complex as some believe they are fully GdD and others think they were given GdD like powers and rights and go beyond mere representatives of God but speak in the name of God’s authority.

GdD Complex — These menacing beliefs that their unconscious phantasy is that they are the one GdD. Unfortunately, this phantasy is not at all rare, especially among the ELITISTS that think they can do no wrong and view all others as their pawns and inferiors.

GdD Complex infects mostly a class of men (and some women) much stronger than is usual in most of humanity. The Complex forms a constant and integral part of their unconscious and many run empires, banks, or corporations.

GdD Complex observed in the EXTREME – We know many such men become visibly insane and profess openly their delusion that they are actually God. Mental institutions have many instances of these kinds of menacing individuals, who respect no one else and therefore do as they please regardless of who it hurts. This GdD complex causes individuals to have no normal inhibitions and no feeling of consciousness around others and ignore others needs. Analysis of a number of individuals with whom this complex is strongly pronounced show clear and definable character traits as follows:

#1 They have no concept of being a loving GdD, but believe anything they do is GdD’s work and this can involve horrible actions and deeds.

#2 A colossal narcissism is the most typical personality feature, far beyond basic narcissism.

#3 Their extreme Narcissism leads to self admiration of their powers, knowledge, & physical-mental qualities

#4 They have primitive Psycho-sexual tendencies involving auto-eroticism & exhibitionism and do things in public that terrify others some involving intimate behaviors. These traits cannot be separated from their character causing very negative impacts.

But there are many semi-functional GdD Complex individuals that live in out society(s). The characteristics of functioning G-d Complex individuals include:

#1 One characteristic of many functioning G-d Complex individuals is a false & excessive self-modesty, which at times is so pronounced as to be truly a self-effacement (act of making oneself seem inconspicuous, humble and timid) and they never using the word “I” in a sentence. This covers for their strong self-conceit and/or vanity. They are obviously aware that they must cover their GdD Complex to operate in society.

#2 They often pretend to be aloof with no interest in playing an active role in the affairs of life, which is a gross exaggeration or affectation and not a primary character-tendency as they feel they are far beyond mortals and have the rights and privileges to dominate all life.

#3 They like to surround themselves in a cloud of mystery and will avoid other people and living in seclusion away from the masses and the normal throng of life. They may come into their daily work but do not mix after work except at their club(s) or at restaurants with others that have similar afflictions. They maintain great secrecy to coverup their auto-eroticism and other perverse tendencies.

#4 They impose a ora of mystery, secrecy and inaccessibility that involves appearance, possessions, behaviors, and especially beliefs. They create secret organizations including secretive corporations and even secretive nations especially in finance. H. G. Wells, in his novel ‘Tono-Bungay’, gives an amusing description of the difficulties in obtaining an audience with a successful financier. The applicants are sorted out in room after room by one secretary after the other, and only a vary few are fortunate enough to penetrate to the Holy of Holies and come face to face with the great man himself. Napoleon also expounded this contemptuous attitude toward the masses very wittily. He is said to have formed the rule, particularly during busy times, of never answering a letter until it was three months old. On being once criticised for this, he remarked taht it saved much trouble for he found that most letters answered themselves in this time.

#5 They are extremely BAD CITIZENS because they care nothing for the rest of humanity.

#6 They have an inability to learn outside their belief system — They shut out or reject any facts that go against their GdD-like beliefs. Their attitude that they “know it all” so there is NO new knowledge they need, and reject all help in their reasoning. This is so pronounced in their character that it cannot be ignored. On the other hand they will tell you they are always open-minded to new ideas but then when they hear a new idea they either immediately reject it or quickly grab it, modify it, and make it their own. They think nothing of robbing others of their ideas, wealth, and resources. They never give credit to the originator of the idea or the wealth they confiscate by any means.

#7 To maintain mystery their writing is never clear and concise and to the point. Often there is no point or the point is instead deeply hidden under a mountain of jargon and useless banter or stories. This is done to add to their self-important mystery status. They make their message, if they have one, as obscure and unreadable and confusing as possible.

#8 They tend to try to dress with a distinctness peculiar to themselves. The suggestion that they resemble someone else is unacceptable. The veil of mystery and obscurity that they cast over themselves naturally extends to their entire way of life of narcissistic self-importance including their auto-erotic perversions. During confidential chats with intimate friends they take the greatest pleasure in talking about himself in the fullest minuteness and is never weary of discussing and dissecting his own mental attributes. They are apt to be successful lecturers and after-dinner speakers, showing a fondness for this that contrasts with his other reactions to exhibitionism.

EXAMPLE: Actual Phatasy Expressess by GdD Complex Patient – He confessed his greatest wish was to own a castle on a distant mountain at the very extremity of the country (near the sea); as he drove up to it he was to sound a terrific horn in his automobile so that the blast would reverberate along the hills (thunders of Jehovah and Zeus, paternal flatus), and on hearing it the servants and retainers were to disappear to their underground chambers, leaving everything prepared for him in the castle; under no circumstances were they ever to see him. Such men in actual life all manner of access difficulties by screening appointments by secretaries interviewing all visitors first to be sure they meet his requirements. This accessibility feature is prominent among nobility, kings, popes and many high-level business men as they desire distance from the masses. They impose their desire for secrecy and inaccessibility through these extreme exaggerations.

EXAMPLE: Actual Phantasy expressed by a GdD Complex Patient – King Lewis of Bavaria was a typical case of this as he began to imitate Louis XIV (named ‘ Stekel), and proceeded to identify himself formerly with the French Musical, Le Roi Soleil. It is further related that at this stage he refused to interview people unless there was a screen between him and them, and that when he went out, his guards had to warn people of his approach, to get them to hide in time and shelter themselves from his Magnificent Presence. Such behavior can only indicate the belief that the rays emanating from his GdDly presence were charged with the power of destruction. The king’s solicitude possibly covered repressed death-wishes. We have here a recrudescence (copying) of the old Egyptian, Persian and Grecian projection of the father as a sun-god, one that played an important part also in early Christianity. The significance of the phantasy is both paranoia and an aire of mystery as Freud pointed out in his Schreber analysis. In full insanity, the patient may identify both his father and himself with the sun, as in the instance just mentioned, or else only the former, as with a paranoid disorder patient of mine who spent the greater part of ten years defiantly staring at the sun. In more normal people such fantasies remain in the unconscious, and only a refined form of them can penetrate through to consciousness, such as the desire for aloofness. This desire, therefore, seems mainly to express, in an indirect way, a colossal narcissistic exhibitionist tendency, being based on the person’s belief that his proximity is fraught with tremendous power on other people, and that the glory of his presence may dazzle or even blind them; as a precaution against such terrible consequences he withdraws to a distance whenever possible. A repressed tendency that also plays a part in determining this attitude is revealed by consideration of the fear of blinding others. This of course symbolizes the fear, i. e. the repressed wish, that he may castrate them. This wish and the accompanying fear of being castrated are prominent characteristics of the group of complexes under consideration.

—————————-▶

Other Well-Known Similar Complexes

1910 AD The Oedipus complex or Oedipal Complex is a concept of psychoanalytic theory coined by Sigmund Freud. It refers to a child’s unconscious desire for the opposite-sex parent, thought as a necessary stage of psychosexual development. Freud considered that the child’s identification with the same-sex parent is the successful resolution of the complex and that unsuccessful resolution of the complex might lead to neurosis, pedophilia, and homosexuality.

1913 Freud deprecated the term “Electra complex”, which was introduced by Carl Gustav Jung in regard to the Oedipus complex manifested in young girls. Freud further proposed that the Oedipus complex, which originally refers to the sexual desire of a son for his mother, is a desire for the parent in both males and females, and that boys and girls experience the complex differently: boys in a form of castration anxiety, girls in a form of penis envy.

—————————-▶

ADDED SOURCES:

Stekel: ‘Zur Psychologic des Exhibitionismus ‘, Zentralblatt fiir Psychoanalyse, Jahrg. I., S. 494.

Freud: ‘Beitrage zur Psychologic des Liebeslebens ‘, I, Jahr- buck der Psychoanalyse, Bd. II, S. 389.

Freud: ‘Nachtrag’, Jahrbuch der Psychoanalyse, Bd. Ill, S. 588.

Freud: Imago, 1912, Bd. I, S. 306-15.

Ernest Jones (1879–1958), a neurologist and psychoanalyst was a lifelong friend and colleague of Sigmund Freud from their first meeting in 1908, and became his official biographer. Jones was the first English-speaking practitioner of psychoanalysis and became its leading exponent in the English-speaking world.

Dr. Ernest Jones

Publications & Books by Ernest Jones:

Click for Source Article on Ernest Jones on Wikipedia

1912. Papers on Psycho-Analysis. London: Balliere Tindall & Cox. Revised and enlarged editions, 1918, 1923, 1938, 1948 (5th edition).
1920. Treatment of the Neuroses. London: Balliere Tindall & Cox
1921. Psycho-Analysis and the War Neuroses. With Karl Abraham, Sandor Ferenczi and Ernst Simmel. London: International Psycho-Analytical Press
1923. Essays in Applied Psycho-Analysis. London: International Psycho-Analytical Press. Revised and enlarged edition, 1951, London: Hogarth Press. Reprinted (1974) as Psycho-Myth, Psycho-History. 2 vols. New York: Hillstone.
1924 (editor). Social Aspects of Psycho-Analysis: Lectures Delivered under the Auspices of the Sociological Society. London: Williams and Norgate.
1928. Psycho-Analysis. London: E. Benn. Reprinted (1949) with an Addendum as What is Psychoanalysis ?. London: Allen & Unwin.
1931a. On the Nightmare. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
1931b. The Elements of Figure Skating. London: Methuen. Revised and enlarged edition, 1952. London: Allen and Unwin.
1949. Hamlet and Oedipus. London: V. Gollancz.
1953. Sigmund Freud: Life and Work. Vol 1: The Young Freud 1856–1900. London: Hogarth Press.
1955. Sigmund Freud: Life and Work. Vol 2: The Years of Maturity 1901–1919. London: Hogarth Press.
1957. Sigmund Freud: Life and Work. Vol 3: The Last Phase 1919–1939. London: Hogarth Press.
1961. Sigmund Freud: Life and Work. An abridgment of the preceding 3 volume work, by Lionel Trilling and Stephen Marcus, with Introduction by Lionel Trilling. New York: Basic Books.
1956. Sigmund Freud: Four Centenary Addresses. New York: Basic Books
1959. Free Associations: Memories of a Psycho-Analyst. Epilogue by Mervyn Jones. London: Hogarth Press. Reprinted (1990) with a New Introduction by Mervyn Jones. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

—————————-▶

“Being God” by Terry Stueck, exposes Man’s Failure to Live under God’s Ownership.

We have a tendency to own ourselves which makes us our own God in practice. Adam did a felony of grand theft of God’s power by stealing God’s position as owner of the garden and rule-maker by directing our own life and ignoring the creator who is the true owner. This truth lived out in the lives of the first century Christians and turned the world upside down. Elevating God to His rightful position as owner is the foundation of humility and the only way to defeat pride.

Click for book Being God

Advertisements

HOW DID KHAZARS INFECT THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE OR BYZANTINE EMPIRE TO RULE THE CATHOLIC EMPIRE? HERE IS THE TIMELINE OF THE FACTS

HOW DID KHAZARS INFECT THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE OR BYZANTINE EMPIRE TO RULE THE CATHOLIC EMPIRE? HERE IS THE TIMELINE OF THE FACTS

MULTIPLE KHAZAR EMPERORS INFECTED THE EASTERN CHRISTIAN ROMAN EMPIRE WITH PAGAN IDOLS & ICONS 

732 AD-741 AD The Byzantine Eastern Roman Empire was under threat of invasion from the then powerful military of the Umayyad Caliphate in Iraq-Arabia-Syria that became a giant empire in a very short time. Ruling from 717 AD-741 AD was Byzantine Emperor Leo III (675 AD-741 AD), called the Turk from the mountains of Syria. In 730s Leo III was in a panic in fear of the Caliphate, and sent a representative to Bihar, the Khagan ruler of the KHAZARS for help, as the KHAZARS had been at war with the Umayyad Caliphate for years. The KHAZARS agreed and an alliance was made. Part of the alliance was that the KHAZAR Khagan would send his daughter Tzitzak, a KHAZAR PRINCESS, to marry Constantine V, Leo III’s son and also junior co-ruler with Leo III. At that time Constantine was a child in his pre-teens. So in fact KHAZAR Khagan Bihar was the grandfather of Emperor Leo IV the Khazar, and BIHAR was called Viharos (angry, thunderous, and rough) by Armenian sources. In 755 AD Tzitzak was escorted to Constantinople for her marriage to Constantine who was about fourteen years old, while Tzitzak may have been even younger (perhaps 11 to 13 years old) as she did not give birth for eighteen years in 750 AD. Tzitzak became a Christian under the baptismal name Irene. Tzitzak’s wedding gown became famous, starting a new fashion craze in Constantinople for male robes called tzitzakia. Tzitzak or Irene the KHAZAR learned to read religious texts and was described as quietly religious which contrasts with her husband, Constantine.

741 AD Leo III died and Constantine V became sole Emperor with Khazar Empress Irene as effectively the reigning queen. However, civil war broke out almost immediately as Artabasdos, brother-in-law of Constantine V, claimed the throne for himself. The civil war lasted until late 743 AD.

750 AD Constantine and Tzitzak had a son, Leo IV, who would succeed his father as Emperor and was better known as “Leo the Khazar”. Irene lived to the year 803 AD and served as co-ruler with her son for a time.

751 AD LEO IV was crowned co-emperor by his father at age 1. Leo was originally betrothed to Gisela, daughter of Pepin the Short (King of Franks succeeded by his son Charlemagne) but the contract was broken. Leo then married Irene, a Khazar princess from a noble Khazar family December 769 AD.

775 AD Constantine V died, leaving Leo, the KHAZAR, as sole emperor.

775 AD-780 AD: Leo IV, the Khazar, became Byzantine Emperor. The short 30 year life of Leo IV (750 AD-780 AD), the KHAZAR, son of Emperor Constantine V (718 AD-775 AD) by his first wife, Irene, the Khazar (752 AD-803 AD), who was a KHAZAR princess, the daughter of KHAZAR ruler, Khagan Bihar. Irene (KHAZAR originally named Tzitzak) became empress by marriage to Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine V, ruler from 741 AD to 775 AD.

Click for Source Article on Irene or Tzitzak, The Khazar Princess

Click for Source Article on Leo IV, The Khazar

Click for Source Article on Byzantine Emperors

776 AD Leo, the KHAZAR, followed the precedent set by his father and grandfather and appointed his son, Constantine VI, co-emperor at age 5. This was supported by the army, Senate, and citizens. So Leo’s young son Constantine VI, was crowned co-emperor, passing over the Caesar Nicephorus, a stepbrother of Leo who conspired with his half-brothers to stop LEO, the KHAZAR, but the this was suppressed, and the conspirators were exiled. Nikephoros, Leo the KHAZAR’S son (by another wife, possibly Eudokia), was blinded and exiled to a monastery for most of his life, probably dying on the Turkish island of Aphousia sometime around 812 AD.

776 AD-777 AD Leo the Khazar profited from discord among the Bulgars by granting the Bulgar khan Telerig asylum in Constantinople and marrying him to a Khazar cousin of his wife Irene. He also conducted three campaigns against the Arabs between 777 AD-780 AD. Telerig was ruler of Bulgaria between 768 AD–777 AD and was considered the immediate successor of Pagan, who was murdered in 768. 774 AD Byzantine Emperor Constantine, Leo the Khazar’s father embarked on a major attack against Bulgaria, leading his field army on land, and dispatching a fleet of two thousand ships carrying horsemen towards the Danube delta and Varna, but the emperor did not press his potential advantage and inexplicably retreated. Shortly afterwards the two sides signed a truce promising the cessation of hostilities. 774 Telerig sent an army of twelve thousand men to raid Berzitia, Macedonia and to transfer its population to Bulgaria. Collecting a large army of eighty thousand troops, Constantine V surprised the Bulgarians and won a resounding victory. The subsequent attack on Bulgaria failed, because the imperial fleet encountered contrary winds in the Black Sea. Unfortunately, for Telerig his loss put him in deep trouble in Bulgaria. So he begged Constantine V to help him flee Bulgaria and seek refuge with the emperor, even asking for hospitality and a list of Byzantine people who might help him, even after he had betrayed the treaty with Constantine. Oddly, Constantine agreed and betrayed his own agents in Bulgaria, who were then executed and NO Byzantine retaliation materialize as Constantine V died in 775. So Telerig found it necessary to flee to the new Byzantine emperor, Leo IV the Khazar in 777 AD, and amazingly, Telerig was granted asylum and even given a title (patrikios) and Telerig converted to Christianity with a new name of Theophylaktos and married a Khazar cousin of the Khazar Empress Irene, Leo the Khazars mother.

780 AD-797 AD KHAZAR Emperor Leo IV died in 780 AD at age of only 30 supposedly as a result of a fever brought on by precious stones in his crown, but more likely Leo the KHAZAR was murdered by his mother Irene the KHAZAR and her battery of criminals. Once Leo the KHAZAR was out-of-the-way, Irene the KHAZAR & Ruler Constantine VI (771 AD-790 AD) who only 9 became rulers of the BYZANTINE EMPIRE. Constantine VI was the only son of Leo IV, the KHAZAR, and had been Co-emperor since 776 AD when he was 5 years old. But because he was only 9, he was under the guidance of his mother, Irene the KHAZAR. In 787 AD Irene, the KHAZAR, called the Second Council of Nicaea which condemned her husbands practice of iconoclasm, and she restored the veneration of icons/pagan idols to Christian practice. Previously in 780 AD, Irene, the KHAZAR, had crushed what she thought was a plot to overthrow her and her son by the Iconoclasts, who opposed her CULT of icons (prohibited in 730 AD) and she believed they wanted to put Nicephorus, a son by Leo the KHAZAR’s other wife, on the throne.

787 AD-797 AD The more likely truth is that as Constantine VI approached maturity, he grew resentful of his mother’s controlling influence in the empire and attempted to remove her as Empress. But Irene, the KHAZAR, demanded the military sware an oath of loyalty to her as ruler. Anger at this demand, prompted the administrative divisions of Asia Minor to open resistance to Irene, the KHAZAR, in 790 and Constantine VI was proclaimed sole ruler and his mother was banished from court. But in early 792 AD, Irene was allowed to return to court and even to resume her position as co-ruler. Irene’s skillful intrigues with the bishops and courtiers enabled her to organized a conspiracy against her own son Constantine VI, who was arrested, blinded, and put in prison on his mother’s orders in 797 AD.

790 AD Irene was so hungry for power she accused her own son of being incapable of ruling. Irene the KHAZAR ordered the palace to overthrow her son, blind him, and toss him in prison. Constantine died most likely from his wounds within a year. A ruthlessness not uncommon amongst Khazar rulers!

797 AD-802 AD For five years, Irene, the Khazar Tzitzak, became sole Byzantine emperor with full power. In 798 AD she boldly opened diplomatic relations with the Western Emperor Charlemagne, and in 802 a marriage between her and Charlemagne was reportedly contemplated. Some Historians try to pretend this Irene was NOT the Khazar Tzitzak and try to argue she died at the birth of her son. In 802 AD, the officials and Generals after seeing Irene was such a vile power-hungry ruler, deposed her in a palace coup. Irene, the KHAZAR, was exiled first to the island of Prinkipo (now Turkish Island of Büyükada) and then to Greek Island Lesbos where she died in 803 AD. 802 AD Nicephorus I, the minister of finance under Irene, the KHAZAR, was placed on the throne and died in 811 AD.

MY RELIGION IS BETTER THAN YOUR RELIGION = THE CRY OF SUPERIORITY FOR DIVIDE & CONQUER!

MY RELIGION IS BETTER THAN YOUR RELIGION = THE CRY OF SUPERIORITY FOR DIVIDE & CONQUER!

See detailed Pagan Era history – Before Common Era (BCE) BELOW.

Paganism practices polytheism practiced in Bronze Age and by some powerful Elitist groups today who impose their religions perversions on humanity.

Click for Source Article on Mainstream Religions Versus Pagan Religions

In early times people did not call themselves pagans. The early Jewish Rabbis & Christian Church created the term pagan as a pejorative label they could use to degrade others as inferior. “Hellene” or “gentile” (by Jews) remained the word for pagan.

Pagan or Latin pagus originally meant ‘region delimited by markers’.
Paganus as a religious term referred to conversion patterns during the Christianization of Europe aimed mostly at rural areas.

Paganism within the Roman Empire centered in cities which violates Christian and Jewish arguments that only rural people practiced paganism (often also called Rusticitas).

Early Christians called themselves “soldiers of Christ” but some called Christians “paganus” or civilians.

300s AD-400s AD: Paganus & paganos were used by these worshipers to denote they were outside the bounds of the Christian-Jewish community, and was done with pride.

410 AD The Sack of Rome by Pagan Visigoths led by King Alaric, just fifteen years after the Christian persecution of paganism under Theodosius I. Many believed the old gods cared more about Rome than the Christian god did.

1600 AD: First English definition of the term Pagan joined it with infidel, heretic, unbeliever, idolater, heathen, or gentile which were all pejorative terms to degrade. This showed a total lack of tolerance for other peoples’ chosen religions.  The word “Heathen” comes from Old English for “non-Christian and non-Jew.”

The Christianizing Roman Empire lumped the Greeks in with pagans for their traditional polytheistic religions. In the Greek-speaking Eastern Empire, pagans were—paradoxically—most commonly called Hellenes and the word almost entirely ceased being used for about a thousand years in the west. Because Hellenic culture was the dominant pagan culture in the Roman east, they called pagans Hellenes.  Jews who played a major role in designing Christianity also influenced and encouraged Christians to degrade others as pagans or gentiles to show Superiority over pagans.

300s AD: Usage of Hellenes showed up in the New Testament in St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans. Hellenes is almost always also used to refer to Hebrews regardless of actual ethnicities and Hebrews made up more than half the populations of some Greek cities like Thessaloniki or Salonica where Hebrew rabbis help create the Christian religion there and in Alexander, Egypt.  Some Pagans began to defiantly call themselves Hellenes. The growing religious stigmatization of Hellenism had a chilling effect on Hellenic culture by the 300s AD.

Pagans would have to include Egyptians who had many gods, with each city-state having their own favorites and over time as they were shared some gained favor nationwide while others lost favor in their religious beliefs and ceremonies. We know pagans were religious long before Christianity or Judaism came along. They shared traditions in burial practices, monuments, inscriptions, and statues even though the religion was not formalized in stone or on papyrus. They exercised ritual or religious beliefs that was not as structured as the PRIEST-RABBI imposed system of today’s mainstream. Many varieties of beliefs flourished, were shared, and evolved as did their multitude of stories and both Judaism and Christianity borrowed heavily from these pagan stories handed down over the ages. Virtually nothing in the Bible or in Judaism is new, but is a retelling with enhancements of pagan stories, and this included the story of the son (of) god and his death and rising again. This fact makes Jews, Christians and Muslims and other formal religions angry as they think their stories are all unique to their SUPERIOR RELIGION(S). These religions refer to all other belief systems as CULTS to feel SUPERIOR and degrade others.

While paganism generally implies polytheism, the primary distinction between classical pagans and Christians was not one of monotheism versus polytheism. Not all pagans were strictly polytheist. Throughout history, many of them believed in a supreme deity. To Christians, the most important distinction was whether or not someone worshipped the one true God (meaning their GOD not anyone elses god). If you did not you were a pagan and if you did you were a SUPERIOR being.

Paganism traditionally encompasses non-Christian-Jew cultures so this included Greeks, early Romans, that practiced Mithraism, and Celtic, Germanic, Slavic, Turkic, and Asian tribes.

Later Paganism, refined by Christians & Jews, became associated with hedonism and the sensual & even sexual, materialistic, self-indulgent, enjoyment, and were supposedly unconcerned with the future in their religions so they were called the ignorant masses.  An church authors called it the limitations of paganism.  Pompous British, like G. K. Chesterton wrote: “The pagan set out, with admirable sense, to enjoy himself. By the end of his civilization he had discovered that a man cannot enjoy himself and continue to enjoy anything else.”

Yet religions in ancient & Hellenistic Greece & Ancient Rome were paganism and these civilizations survived for over one thousand years. While Christian empires of Europe come and go in fraction of that time as did Hebrew nations.

Old “Superiority” led to the term Heidentum (‘heathenry’) which observed that man in the pagan view is always defined by ethnicity, i.e. Greek, Roman, Egyptian, Jew, etc., so that each pagan tradition is also a national tradition. Modernized Superiority defines paganism as all “cults combined that do not have a well-defined creed/bible. So that means Christian Science, Mormonism, and even Freemasonry are religions and NOT CULTS.

Again there is nothing new in either Christianity or Judaism or Islam, as Christianity emerged from Second Temple Judaism (or Hellenistic Greek Judaism), it stood in competition with other religions advocating pagan monotheism, including the cult of Dionysus, Neoplatonism, Mithraism, Gnosticism, and Manichaeanism. Dionysus in particular exhibits significant parallels with Christ, so that numerous scholars have concluded that the recasting of Jesus the wandering rabbi into the image of Christ the Logos, the divine savior, reflects the cult of Dionysus directly. They point to the symbolism of wine and the importance it held in the mythology surrounding both Dionysus and Jesus Christ. Perhaps the stories are refined a bit, but they follow the same plot lines.

Jewish superiority looks down on Christianity as, though claiming to be monotheistic, is a form of polytheism say Jews because of the Christian doctrine of the Trinity (Father, Son & Holy Ghost), baptizing, and Christianization of Jews and other factors.

Catholics level charges of idolatry against Protestants and Protestants level corruption charges at the Catholic purgatory for a price and Vatican pedophilia. So, the concept of the SUPERIOR RELIGION is nothing more than a tool to DIVIDE & CONQUER.

Same evolutionary pressures happened with Arabic & Asian paganism causing them to likewise gradually be absorbed by Islam or Hinduism, again with both borrowing heavily from other religions and ancient pagan religions and their stories or mythology handed down for as much a thousands of years.

1700s AD-2000s AD Interest in pagan traditions was first revived during the Renaissance, when magic was practiced from the Kabbala (Cabala) and Greco-Roman magic. These made pagan traditions like Santa Claus and Easter eggs part of the culture, and added certain extreme pagan ways for those that enjoy perversions. We see these perversions slipping into Judaism in particular today and therefore forced on the masses by the media.

New improved Paganism even honors literary Celtic and Viking revivals, that portray historical Celtic, Viking, Druid, and Germanic polytheists as noble savages and embrace their mythology, folklore, and fairy tales being told to their children. In England, for example, today children are shown standing with The Lady of Cornwall in full neopagan dressed ceremony.

Obviously, mainstream “superiority” priest run religiond have left a severe vacuum and dissatisfaction that needs to be filled and so people go in search of something more freeing and flexible. But the problem arrises when the powerful Rothschilds & their puppets run their most destructive picks of perversions 24/7 through their owned mainstream media and education systems.

Of course, more concerning we also see the Rothschilds neopaganism driven atheistic anti-religion of Israel & Saudi Wahhabism that have the worst evil built into the principles they then impose on humanity for False Flag Wars and Destruction for their profit.

English Egyptologist Arthur Weigall argues that the essential doctrines of Christianity (& Judaism) have been influenced by paganism, or European occultism.

Nothing NEW was created and only the stories were refined.

—————————-▶

PAGAN ERA – Detailed Timeline history of Before Common Era (BCE) Religions

40,000 BCE: Religion — New South Wales, Australia – The remains of one of the earliest anatomically modern humans to be cremated was buried near Lake Mungo.

38,000 BCE: Religion — Germany – The Aurignacian Löwenmensch figurine, the oldest known animal-shaped sculpture in the world and one of the oldest known sculptures in general, and it gave a human characteristics to an animal, although it may have represented a deity. The oldest discovered “Venus figurines” appeared in graves. Some were deliberately broken or repeatedly stabbed, possibly representing the murders of the men with whom they were buried, or owing to some other unknown social dynamic.

25,000 BCE–21,000 BCE: Religion — Spain-Wales-Eastern Europe – Clear examples of burials are present in Iberia, Wales, and eastern Europe. These, too, incorporate the heavy use of red ochre. Additionally, various objects were included in the graves (e.g. periwinkle shells, weighted clothing, dolls, possible drumsticks, mammoth ivory beads, fox teeth pendants, panoply of ivory artifacts, “baton” antlers, flint blades etc.).

13,000 BCE–8,000 BCE: Religion — Italy – In today’s Italy burial activity resumed. Dozens of men, women, and children were being buried in the same caves which were used for burials 10,000 years beforehand. All these graves are delineated by the cave walls and large limestone blocks. The burials share a number of characteristics (such as use of ochre, and shell and mammoth ivory jewelry) that go back thousands of years. Some burials were double, comprising an adult male with a juvenile male buried by his side. They were now beginning to take on the form of modern cemeteries. Old burials were commonly re-dug and moved to make way for new ones, with the older bones often being gathered and cached together. Large stones may have acted as grave markers. Pairs of ochred antlers were sometimes mounted on poles within the cave; this is compared to the modern practice of leaving flowers at a grave.

9130 BCE–7370 BCE: Religion — Turkey was one of the oldest human-made sites of worship yet discovered. Also noted in South India.

7500 BCE–5700 BCE: Religion — Turkey – The settlements of Catalhoyuk (today’s Turkey) developed as a likely spiritual centre of Anatolia. Possibly practicing worship in communal shrines, its inhabitants left behind numerous clay figurines and impressions of phallic, feminine and hunting scenes.

5500 BCE–4500 BCE: Religion — Caspian Sea-Eurasia – The Proto-Indo-Europeans (PIE) emerged, probably within the Pontic-Caspian steppe. The PIE peoples developed a religion focused on sacrificial ideology, which would influence the religions and cultures throughout Eurasia.

3750 BCE: Religion — Syria-Palestine – The Proto-Semitic people emerged in the Levant (Syria-Palestine). The Proto-Semitic people would migrate throughout the Near East into Mesopotamia, Egypt, Ethiopia and the eastern shore of the Mediterranean.

3300–1300 BCE: Religion — India Region – Major burial sites of the Indus Valley Civilization (northeast Afghanistan to Pakistan and northwest India) was a Bronze Age civilization noted for its cities built of brick, roadside drainage system and multi-storied houses, as well as for creating artifacts linked to religions found in India.

3102 BCE: Religion — India – This was the beginning of Kaliyuga, a new age among the followers of Indian religions.

3100 BCE: Religion — England – The initial form of Stonehenge was completed. The circular bank and ditch enclosure, about 110 metres (360 ft) across, may have been completed with a timber circle.

3100–2900 BCE: Religion — Ireland – Newgrange, the 250,000 ton (226,796.2 tonne) passage tomb aligned to the winter solstice in Ireland, was built

3000 BCE: Religion — Valleys where the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers run (Iraq-Syria) – Sumerian Cuneiform used to write about beliefs and creation of detailed historical religious records.

3000 BCE: Religion — England – The second phase of Stonehenge was completed and appeared to function as the first enclosed cremation cemetery in the British Isles.

2635 BCE–2610 BCE: Religion — Oldest surviving Egyptian Pyramid was commissioned by Pharaoh Djoser.

2600 BCE: Religion — England – Stonehenge began to take on the form of its final phase. The wooden posts were replaced with bluestone and became increasingly complex with an altar, a major entry and consideration of seasonal solar alignments.

2560 BCE: Religion — Egypt – Completion of the Great Pyramid of Giza, the oldest pyramid of the Giza Plateau.

2494 BCE–2345 BCE: Religion — Egypt – The first of the oldest surviving religious texts, the Pyramid Texts, was composed in Ancient Egypt.

2200 BCE: Religion — Crete Island of Greece – The Minoan Civilization developed in Crete. Citizens worshipped a variety of goddesses.

2150 BCE–2000 BCE: Religion — Valleys where the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers run (Iraq-Syria) – The earliest surviving versions of the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh—originally titled “He who Saw the Deep” and “Surpassing All Other Kings” were written.

1738 BCE: Religion — Persia/Iran — YALDA December, 21, 1738 is the Oldest Record Of YALDA night celebrated by Iranians throughout the world today has been celebrated by Iranians who left for India after the Arab invasion. Yalda, on the longest night of the year as Iranians would stay awake all night till the dawn and Dec 22 was a holiday of Daygan, the Day of Equality. Even little lies are considered great sin on Daygan. On Daygan the king and nobles were to dress just like ordinary people so as not to be recognized in the crowd and nobody was supposed to give orders on Daygan. Many Christian, Jewish and Muslim customs have their roots in this tradition.

1700 BCE–1100 BCE: Religion — India – The oldest of the Hindu Vedas (scriptures), the Rig Veda was composed.

1600 BCE: Religion — England – End of ancient development of Stonehenge.

1500 BCE: Religion — India – The Vedic Age began with Aryans settling in India after the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization.

1450 BCE or 1250 BCE: Religion — Bible’s Moses Story – Legend of the Israelite lawgiver Moses being given the Ten Commandments by a burning bush.

1351 BCE or 1353 BCE: Religion — Egypt – The reign of Akhenaten, sometimes credited with starting the earliest known recorded monotheistic religion.

1300 BCE–1000 BCE: Religion — Akkadian version of the Epic of Gilgamesh was edited.

1250 BCE–600 BCE: Religion — India – The Upanishads (Vedic or Aryan texts) were composed, containing the earliest emergence of some of the central religious concepts of Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism.

1200 BCE: Religion — Greece & Mediterranean Region – The Empire & Greek Dark Age began in Mediterranean Region.

1200 BCE: Religion — Mexico – The Olmecs built the earliest pyramids and temples in Central America.

877 BCE–777 BCE: Religion — India – The life of Parshvanatha, 23rd Tirthankara of Jainism.

800 BCE: Religion — Greece & Mediterranean Region – The Greek Dark Age ends.

800s BCE-600s BCE: Religion — India – The Chandogya Upanishad is compiled, significant for containing the earliest to date mention of Krishna.

600–500 BCE: Religion — China – The Earliest Confucian writing, Shu Ching, incorporates ideas of harmony and heaven.

599–527 BCE: Religion — India – The life of Mahavira, 24th and last Tirthankara of Jainism.

563 BCE: Religion — India – Gautama Buddha, founder of Buddhism was born.

551 BCE: Religion — China – Confucius, founder of Confucianism, was born.[17]

440 BCE: Religion — Persia/Iran – Zoroastrianism entered recorded Western history, but was born much earlier – see 1738 BCE above for correct date.

399 BCE: Religion — Greece – Socrates was tried for “refusing to recognize the gods recognized by the state”

369-372 BCE: Religion — China – Birth of famous authors Mencius and Zhuang Zhou with mystic components

300 BCE: Religion — China – The oldest known version of the classic “The Book of the Way of Virtue,” Or Tao Te Ching was written on bamboo tablets.

300 BCE: Religion — Southeast Asia – Theravada Buddhism was introduced to Sri Lanka by the Venerable Mahinda – complete Buddhist canon

250 BCE: Religion — India – The Third Buddhist council was convened.

140 BCE: Religion — India – The earliest grammar of Sanskrit literature used to write about Hinduism was composed by Pāṇini.

100 BCE–500 AD: Religion — India – The Yoga Sūtras of Patañjali, constituting the foundational texts of Yoga, were composed.